Cover photo of Social Policy Journal

Writing Policy: From Monologue to Dialogue

Derek Wallace


In a formal democracy policy makers have an obligation to consult. Indeed, it is often in their interest to do so. Yet often consultation either does not occur, or it occurs in a way that effectively excludes those being consulted. Lack of consultation can result when those in power believe that a population’s best interests are served by deploying specialist, superior decision-making techniques.

However, even when consultation does occur, policy makers can use techniques that significantly limit the amount of influence of the consultation. As evidence I use a case study of the restructuring of the electricity sector between 1986 and 1994.

My analysis reveals that the solution to a public policy problem was identified in advance, and then an attempt made to “manage” this solution through the consultative process.

In this paper I identify some of the principal textual strategies used in both public and sectoral consultation. I do this for the benefit of those policy writers who may be unaware of many of these strategies and their effects, simply employing them out of customary practice (habitus). I then describe an alternative model of policy writing which is designed to be more open to policy making and collaboration.

Cover photo of Social Policy Journal

Documents

Social Policy Journal of New Zealand: Issue 10

Writing Policy: From Monologue to Dialogue

Jun 1998

Print this page.